XTC-24 CE: Imori Green & Orange 12mm
Imori is an arborist climbing lines with a nylon core and enhanced grip. Our 24 carrier CE climbing lines feature modified core constructions to achieve CE EN 1891 compliance. This means CE products will have slightly more elongation than the ANSI equivalent. With their higher elongation characteristics our CE products perform slightly better in MRS Climbing systems. Though they can be used in SRS climbing systems especially when canopy anchored.
Key Features
- Competition grade
- Enhanced grip for better ergonomics
- Exclusive high-grip cover for improved feel & performance
- Steam stabilized nylon core
- Ideal for hitch climbing systems & lanyards
- CE EN 1891 Type A compliance
Imori (eee-mor-lee) means “Good Forest” in Japanese. Yale Cordage has incorporated a new type of taslanized (textured) fiber into the rope structure that provides bulk and, therefore, an enhanced grip for better ergonomics. This fiber is blended with a 100% solution-dyed lament polyester into the construction. This unique blend allows the fibers to be exposed on both the outer sheath and also on the inside of the sheath, providing more friction to the inner core, which helps to minimize excessive elongation while providing superior unsurpassed grip for the climber.
How to Buy
XTC-24 Imori Specifications and Data
| Product (Text) | Diameter (mm) | Average Break Strength *(Lbs) | Suggested Design Factor 10:1 **(Lbs) | Weight (Lbs/100f) |
| Imori | 12 | 6,200 | 620 | 7.0 |
| Product (Text) | Diameter (mm) | Average Break Strength *(kg) | Suggested Design Factor 10:1 **(kg) | Weight (Kg/100m) |
| Imori | 0 | 2,812 | 281 | 10.4 |
* Average break strength is based on spliced rope or capstans samples. Knots and abrupt bends significantly reduce the strength of all ropes and lower the design factor.
** Suggested design factor is based on static or moderately dynamic lifting/pulling operations. Instantaneous changes in load, up or down, in excess of 10% of the rope’s suggested design factor constitute hazardous shock load and would void the suggested design factor recommendation. The end user is responsible for choosing the correct design factor specific to their application.
